On Sep 8, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Patrick Cusack <livinginlosange...@mac.com> wrote:
> Apologies. I have no desire to start an internecine war. I have been reading > up on ARC for the past few hours. I also watched the WWDC video on ARC As with anything complex, it’ll take more than a few hours of reading/watching to get comfortable with it. > , and after having watched and read everything, I kept feeling as if I was > rather comfortable with the old manual memory model. Sure … so was I. But the switch was well worth it. > I guess my real question is "Why did Apple decide to introduce ARC at all?". > I am not convinced that the conventions are any easier than the previous > model of manual retain counts. They’re a _lot_ easier. It might not look that way when you’re reading about all the details, or converting existing code, because then you’re focusing on the rare edge cases. But for the most part when actually coding you can simply ignore ref-counting. Your code becomes more compact and readable, and you’re less likely to make mistakes. —Jens _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
