On 2 Sep 2013, at 2:31 PM, Fritz Anderson <anderson.fr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sep 2, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Todd Heberlein <todd_heberl...@mac.com> wrote:
> 
>> Off topic, but... Wow!  Apple's Bug Reporter has been completely redone. 
>> Nice. My compliments to the Apple folks (who I suspect have not had the most 
>> relaxing summer)
>> 
>> Feeling motivated to file a new report.
> 
> It sure is purty.
> 
> Cocoa developers will want to bear in mind for their development practices 
> that the new forms limit text to lengths much, much shorter than what I had 
> found necessary for a useful bug report. Shorter than many posts to this list 
> that draw helpful replies. For instance, it is practically impossible to 
> iterate attempted workarounds and their effect on application state. Iterated 
> NSLog() output (even if cut down to your guess at the relevant items) is out 
> of the question.
> 
> It may be inadvertent, but it contributes to the cynical (and uninformed) 
> suspicion that Apple never read reports in the first place, so there is no 
> need to let people write long ones. That was the suspicion, and it is not 
> true. To the contrary, I've received direct, generous responses to some 
> reports, based on my having provided enough detail to make the responses 
> possible in the single exchange the respondent had time for.
> 
> Cocoa developers who prepare bug reports off-line should prioritize the 
> content so at least the most important details of the most important cases 
> make it through. Bear in mind that attempts to reproduce may not make it: If 
> you'd been taking an hour to characterize your bugs, ten minutes is enough to 
> tell Apple what it wants to hear. Limit your instrumentation to what would be 
> relevant to your assumptions about the nature of the bug. If your assumptions 
> are wrong, the time Apple's engineers and you take to reconstruct 
> long-disused projects and turn them around for the next line of investigation 
> will, it seems, be time well-spent.
> 
>    ― F

I laid on the snark about two feet too thick. I hope you can take my point if 
you throttle it back 75%.

        — F


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to