On Jun 25, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Wim Lewis <w...@omnigroup.com> wrote: > FWIW, Omni's open-source data objects framework was our response to our > difficulties with CD. It doesn't do everything CoreData does, and it does > some things CoreData doesn't, but if you're considering taking this route, > you might be interested in looking at it.
Likewise, Couchbase Lite[1] and its predecessor TouchDB[2] are other alternative persistent storage libraries (which I happen to work on!) Their priorities are different than CoreData — sync is #1, with with object-mapping being less advanced. If your app needs to be able to sync data with a server or with other clients, I think it’s a no-brainer to choose over CoreData, given the limitations and poor quality of the latter’s iCloud integration. But they’re good as general purpose data stores as well, since they’re open-source, open-format, cross-platform, and give you API access to the underlying document-based NoSQL database. —Jens [1] https://github.com/couchbase/couchbase-lite-ios [2] http://touchdb.org _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
