OK this is really creepy.

KickStarter has the reasonable requirement that one verify one's
identity.  So I entered my first and last name, my real birthday -
which I never post online _anywhere_, so as to avoid identity theft,
and my present home address, which no one at all knows about because
I'm presently couch-surfing.

In less than ten seconds it asked which of four street addresses in
lived at, in Owl's Head, Maine.  While I did live in Owl's Head back
in the day, there were very, very few people who knew my street
address.  KickStarter also knew the make and model of the car I owned
at the time, as well as the exact name of a business partnership that
I co-owned in the late eighties.

I can see how they might come up with my street address and car from a
credit report, but I don't have the first clue how they identified my
business partnership.  We only did one very small consulting gig, and
received just one client paycheck.  We did have a bank account, but
that was over twenty years ago.  I wouldn't have expected such records
to be kept so long, and to be available so quickly.

Mike

On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Michael Crawford <mdcrawf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oopsy-Doodle.
>
> I'll look into what Cocotron and GNUStep have done before actually
> launching my KickStarter Project.
>
> Just about their very first requirement is to state one's funding goal
> and time deadline.  I just took a wild guess and specified thirty
> days, and twenty thousand dollars.
>
> That might sound like a really high hourly rate for just one month's
> work, but I would have to work almost 24/7 to pull it off.
>
> Mike
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Charles Srstka
> <cocoa...@charlessoft.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 22, 2013, at 8:38 PM, Michael Crawford <mdcrawf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Just now I'm about to register a KickStarter project that would
>> compensate me for completely reverse-engineering the Core Data
>> formats.
>>
>>
>> I believe that some of the work on this has been done already; Cocotron and
>> GNUStep both seem to have at least a partial implementation of Core Data. As
>> I stated before, this still makes me hesitant to use it, since even with a
>> reverse engineered version of the framework, you still have the same two
>> problems:
>>
>> 1. You don't know if the reverse engineered framework is 100% complete and
>> covers every single corner case that might arise in a Core Data file, and
>>
>> 2. Since the format isn't published, there's no reason that Apple might make
>> changes to it in the future, including but not limited to features that are
>> technically in the private, internal specification which haven't been
>> implemented yet, but which a reader would still need to be able to deal
>> with.
>>
>> Charles
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael David Crawford
> mdcrawford at gmail dot com
>
>   Custom Software Development for the iPhone and Mac OS X
>   http://www.dulcineatech.com/custom-software-development/



-- 
Michael David Crawford
mdcrawford at gmail dot com

  Custom Software Development for the iPhone and Mac OS X
  http://www.dulcineatech.com/custom-software-development/
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to