Figured there must be something like that :) We have complicated reasons for
doing it with classes (C++ is involved) and since I'm at home hitting reload on
the WWDC ticket site I don't have the docs available.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Torsten Curdt" <tcu...@vafer.org>
To: "Lee Ann Rucker" <lruc...@vmware.com>
Cc: "Oleg Krupnov" <oleg.krup...@gmail.com>, "Cocoa-Dev List"
<cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:27:14 AM
Subject: Re: ^Block statement considered harmful for callbacks?
> MyWeakRef *weakRef = [MyWeakRef weakRefFromObject:self];
>
> ^() = {
> Foo *wself = [weakRef originalObject];
> // wself may be nil, that's cool because we only want to doStuff if 'self'
> is still around.
> [wself doStuff];
> }
How is that different from
__typeof__(self) __weak wself = self;
^() = {
[wself doStuff];
}
...or am I missing something from the beginning of the thread?
cheers,
Torsten
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
