On Feb 24, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote: > On Feb 24, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Scott Ribe <scott_r...@elevated-dev.com> wrote: > >> On Feb 24, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Wade Tregaskis wrote: >> >>> Though technically speaking it's true, and is thus an argument for actually >>> using NULL rather than 0 >> >> No, it's not such an argument at all. The compiler guarantees that null >> pointers converted to int become 0, > > No it very much doesn't. See my citations.
I saw your citations. You're ignoring the "Except as previously specified" clause at the beginning of the sentence you quote. Null pointers converted to int become 0; other pointers are implementation defined. -- Scott Ribe scott_r...@elevated-dev.com http://www.elevated-dev.com/ (303) 722-0567 voice _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
