On Feb 24, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Wade Tregaskis wrote: > Though technically speaking it's true, and is thus an argument for actually > using NULL rather than 0
No, it's not such an argument at all. The compiler guarantees that null pointers converted to int become 0, that constant 0 assigned to a pointer makes it null, and that null pointer compared to 0 is true--regardless of whether the underlying hardware/OS representation of a null pointer is all 0 bits or not. -- Scott Ribe scott_r...@elevated-dev.com http://www.elevated-dev.com/ (303) 722-0567 voice _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
