Begin forwarded message:

> From: Wayne J <lway...@gmail.com>
> Date: 2011年8月23日 上午04时57分32秒格林尼治标准时间+0800
> To: Bing Li <lbl...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Can Peer-to-Peer Model Be Launched in AppStore?
> 
> Sorry, I missed you second question.
> 
> If the iPad is making the connection then this should work on NAT but it 
> should also work on 3G. The only reason it would not work on 3G, that I can 
> think of, is that the carrier might block connections to specific ports on 
> outgoing. However, I don't think this is strictly point to point.  If you 
> have 2 iPad talking to each other they are both behind NAT then they both 
> must connect to a server outside their NATs that will act as a sort of proxy.
> 
> I believe that this is how Skype works. They just call the unknowing servers 
> 'supernodes'. This should also work over 3G unless that carrier blocks it 
> with a firewall or Apple disallows the application from the App store. But 
> neither of these reasons  are technical in nature.
> 
> 
> Wayne
> 
> On Aug 22, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Bing Li wrote:
> 
>> Dear Wayne,
>> 
>> Thanks so much for your email!
>> 
>> I don't understand your opinions well. Jens said 3G did not allow incoming 
>> connections. So I think P2P does not work in such an environment. I have to 
>> try to use app notifications. The major reason I use P2P is to get a lower 
>> load on the server and users can get pushed data.
>> 
>> For iPad/iPhone within a NAT, I will ask the device to connect the server 
>> outside the NAT firstly. So a connection can be established. Pushing can be 
>> done without the block of NAT.
>> 
>> Do you think my solution works?
>> 
>> Best,
>> Bing
>> 
>> 

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to