On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Matt Neuburg <m...@tidbits.com> wrote: > On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 14:28:46 -0800, Kyle Sluder <kyle.slu...@gmail.com> said: > >> But transactions aren't actions. I'd even argue that putting this >> convenience method on CATransaction might have been a mistake. >> > > It's not merely a convenience. We live in an age of blocks; we want the > block-based approach to replace the old delegate-based approach. One is not > merely a convenient form of the other; they are fundamentally different > architectures. For true layer animation (as opposed to view animation) this > *is* the block-based approach. Apple did not give a CAAnimation a completion > block property, so you *have* to use CATransaction to get one. m.
As I mentioned before, we subclasses CAAnimationGroup to put the completion handler in the "right" (logically consistent) place. --Kyle Sluder_______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
