On Nov 7, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote: > It sounds like you're confusing transactions with animation groups.
To touch on this, I certainly don't believe I am. The inner transaction code is all a self-contained atomic action. What I need to do is simply call the self-contained action, and when it's done, fire off another particular action. A CATransaction completion block sounds perfect for that to me. Paraphrasing: "At the end of any animations performed within this transaction, run the completion block." That's exactly what I want, and to me, nested transactions with animations should count. Whether they do or not is not clear. Using an animation group to try to achieve the same would be a lot more code and involve more entanglement between things. -- Seth Willits _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
