On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Eric Hermanson <zmons...@mac.com> wrote: > I understand what you are saying, but if you do IO correctly you'll do it in > a background thread anyway.
Poppycock. Why do you think non-blocking synchronization primitives exist? > So waiting on a blocking socket until it times > out or gives EOF is normally how IO is done. Maybe that's normally how you've done IO, but other solutions exist. --Kyle Sluder _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
