On May 15, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Ilan Volow wrote:
Apple hasn't addressed the need for Cocoa to interact with database
servers, so you'll be on your own in this dept.
(I've never worked with Core Data)
Given the complexity of Core Data (and the occasionally interspersed
warnings, that this stuff is no "entry level") it sounds silly that it
would not support database servers, that is, supporting multi-user,
locking and transactions.
Even more, it would in no way an exaggerated asset if it would
seamlessly support to create application servers, leveraging DO, and
creating web applications with minimal code changes starting from a
single- or a client server model.
If this would be really true, any serious database application could
not use Core Data. So, for what is it anyway? Storing the users
preferences? Creating your own local CD-collection application?
I really can‘t believe this. It would be a great faux-pas! Do I
really miss something? Is this limitation anywhere documented?
Andreas
Grosam
-- Ilan
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
