If you feel that the bindings doc is unclear about this, thats one
thing to claim, and something to file a bug about. I can't guarantee
that it'll change though. I've never heard the argument that we have
two different types of bindings before this thread.
but if you're arguing with mmalc and I that we don't know what the doc
says, I can assure you we both do.
It's now been explained that we don't have two different types of
bindings by the people who wrote that doc, and one of the engineers
that works on the implementation.
I'm unsure why this thread even started up again.
On Jul 7, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Hamish Allan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:12 AM, mmalc crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Jul 2, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Hamish Allan wrote:
This is a rather unuseful attitude to take. Clearly, this thread
started as a result of the distinction. Also, Apple's own
documentation disagrees with you, as it states that Cocoa bindings
are
built on KVB.
No, it doesn't.
No, really, it does! Read Ken's post again: he links to docs that talk
of Cocoa bindings "relying on" KVB, and KVB being one of the main
technologies "underpinning" Cocoa bindings. You yourself make pretty
much the same distinction:
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
