On Aug 10, 2015, at 13:27 , Seth Willits <sli...@araelium.com> wrote: > > What am I missing?
Coming at this from the other end (other than what Greg said): — I think you are misunderstanding what NS_UNAVAILABLE means (although I’m by no means sure about that). — You never needed to say anything about the “unavailable” initializers because they were never inherited. That is, if you were trying to prevent clients of Subclass from using the Superclass initWithSomething, you didn’t need to because Swift won’t let them do it anyway. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
