On Aug 10, 2015, at 4:27 PM, Seth Willits wrote: > > I've yet to understand this: > https://gist.github.com/swillits/3133e114f770947b3cf6 > > > If a subclass says that its superclass's designated initializer is > unavailable (IOW, the subclass's designated initializer must be used), why > does the compiler produce a warning that the superclass's designated > initializer must be overridden in the subclass? > > If the subclass is going to call super's designated initializer via [super > init....] then this subclass override would never get called anyway... > > What am I missing?
Is it that it's overridden in the subclass and the subclass then calls the initializer in super? Is it just making sure that the subclass is called first, then that calls the superclass initializer, then when that finishes, the rest of the subclass's initializer code gets called? Alex Zavatone _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
