I think adjustment amounts differ from RSA to RSA (Regional Sailing Association of US Sailing). My RSA's PHRF rules are here: http://rmsail.org/?page_id=215 (scroll down to "Standard Adjustments"). They say -6 for SMW > 180% of J. And they say only +6 for fixed two-blade prop, whereas NCPHRF gives +12 for that ( http://www.ncphrf.com/Preddy%20additions/Fleet%20Rules/Fleet%20rules%202013.pdf , Article II.3.D). I don't think I have much choice but to live by the PHRF rules of my RSA.
Cheers, Randy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ronald B. Frerker via CnC-List" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> To: "cnc-list" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> Cc: "Ronald B. Frerker" <rbfrer...@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 11:09:14 AM Subject: Re: Stus-List 30-1 PHRF Rating I believe that should only be a 3sec/mi correction to the base then. Ron Wild Cheri C&C 30-1 STL From: Randy Stafford via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> To: cnc-list <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> Cc: randy.staff...@comcast.net Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 11:10 PM Subject: Re: Stus-List 30-1 PHRF Rating I should have mentioned, my spinnakers' max widths are both "only" 184% of J. Randy _______________________________________________ This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
_______________________________________________ This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
