I'm in the throes of repowering a 1986 33 II.  After much deliberation, I
chose a Beta 25 to replace the existing Yanmar 2gm.  Dimensionally, the
replacement sat within the footprint of the existing Yanmar.  The problem is
that the footprint assumes a square engine space with access on both sides
and that that the relative widths of the port and starboard sides of the
engine, (including peripherals) are similar. Unfortunately, that is not the
case. 
 

All the available engines in the appropriate size range, including the new
Yanmar 3YM20, have the heat exchanger and exhaust system located on the port
side rather than to starboard as on the 2 GM and, I believe, the 3GM as
well.  This of course dramatically changes how the new engine sits in the
available space.  I turns out that the port side of the Beta profile is the
narrowest of the available engines, but only by a few millimeters.     

 

We determined that the port side of the engine box was about 2 inches too
narrow to accommodate the heat exchanger and were forced to accept the fact
that we were going to have to alter the port side of the engine enclosure to
provide the space required.  We also realized that we needed to provide
additional access to allow potential removal of the heat exchanger and
easier access to the starter (more likely).

 

Fortunately, on the 33 II, there is a dead space on the port side of the
engine enclosure under the quarter berth of sufficient width that could be
used to provide the required access. This meant cutting out the side of the
enclosure and a small section of the quarter berth.  The removed section
will be cut and reconfigured to accommodate the extra width for the engine
and refastened to allow future access to the port side of the engine and the
stuffing box if necessary.

 

It also turns out that the configuration of the after storage lockers under
the quarter berth presented an additional impediment for the exhaust and CW
discharge on the new engine.  The bulkhead is within 18 inches of the end of
the exhaust manifold and there is insufficient space to the accommodate the
exhaust riser and "bend" the wet exhaust hose around the bulkhead to connect
to the water lock.  Wasn't an issue with the old 2GM!  This matter was
resolved with the installation of a "crossover" riser unit that Beta can
supply.

 

Thought some might be interested in hearing about the trials and
tribulations of one repowering exercise.  Nothing that a few boat bucks
won't solve! 

 

Gord Tidmarsh

"Masquerade"

' 86 C&C 33 Mk II         

_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to