And if we haven't beat this to death yet, (it is winter, after all.) one
more on gnss and time."

 

http://www.profsurv.com/magazine/article.aspx?i=71249

 

randy

Tamanawas

29-II

Hood River, OR

 

 

 

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Leslie
Paal
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:45 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List More on GPS accuracy & Einstein

 

some numbers to put it into perspective

1) clocks at GPS orbital altitudes will tick faster by about 45,900 ns/day
2) clocks moving at GPS orbital speeds will tick slower by about 7,200
ns/day
3) clocks adjusted before launch to these numbers, resulting no more than
+/- 200 ns/day error
(1 ns = 1 foot)

4) gravitational lensing is not an issue, and there is no difference in the
speed of light in any direction from an observer (GPS related)

5) there is some curving of the RF signal due to air density changes, ground
users can ignore it.

6) accuracy of the orbital position of each satellite is the major component
of the solution accuracy.  Satellites do not fly in perfect, repetitive
circle.  For example the pressure of the sunlight is a very observable
effect....

 

To get "extreme" accuracy, down to a couple of centimeters, is not done in
real time.  It takes inputs from many different sources and long
computations.  But it is very satisfactory when the ground observations
match the GPS solutions...

 

Leslie.

 

  _____  

From: "dre...@gmail.com" <dre...@gmail.com>
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 7:04 AM
Subject: Re: Stus-List More on GPS accuracy & Einstein





Hi,

 

While we are chatting about how GPS works and its accuracy, I would like add
a few interesting tidbits.   

 

A good part of the accuracy come from taking Einstein's Relativity into
account.  Special Relativistic effects like properly calculating doppler
shifts and relative motion are important, but also General Relativistic
effects need to be applied.   For example, Special Relativity states that
moving clocks run slower, but General Relativity states that clocks run
slower in a gravitational field.   Satellites are moving fast compared to
someone on Earth so this makes their clocks to run slower.  But satellites
feel less of the earth's gravity so our Earth-bound clocks run slower.
Since a satellite speed, while fast to us is slow relative to the speed of
light,  our Earthly clocks end up running slower than clocks on GPS
satellites (~50 microseconds/day which amounts to about a 7 nautical mile
spread!).  Also, light (i.e. GPS signals) do not travel in a straight path
as one assumes in triangulating a "fix".  Rather matter curves space around
it, so GPS signals actually bend (i.e. gravitational lensing).  The latter
effect, which is tiny compared to the former, was actually proved using a
sextant of sort, by measuring a star's position during a solar eclipse in
1919.

 

While these effects are ordinarily insignificant for life on Earth, they are
important on the scale of GPS accuracy.    I am sure that Einstein did not
have GPS in mind when he wrote down the theory of Relativity, but I'll still
thank him nonetheless.

 

 

-
Paul E.
1979 C&C 29 Mk1
S/V Johanna Rose
Carrabelle, FL 

 

On Jan 29, 2013, at 8:44 AM, cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com wrote:





Message: 5
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:55:03 +0000
From: "Brent Driedger" < <mailto:bren...@highspeedcrow.ca>
bren...@highspeedcrow.ca>
To: "Leslie Paal" < <mailto:lpaalc...@yahoo.com> lpaalc...@yahoo.com>,
<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List More on GPS accuracy
Message-ID:
          <499177535-1359438905-
<mailto:cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-19847309...@b17.c8.bise6.bl
ackberry>
cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1984730907-@b17.c8.bise6.blackberry
>
          
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"

I'm enjoying this in depth GPS education.
I recall some scuttlebutt in Sail magazine a year or two ago warning that
most of the birds in the system were approaching their "best before date" of
over 25 years and without getting immediate replacement the system would be
down a few leaving some holes or temporary signal loss in some locations in
the coming years. Have you heard any updates to this rumor?

Brent Driedger
s/v Wild Rover
C&C 27-5
Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone on the MTS High Speed Mobility Network

-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie Paal < <mailto:lpaalc...@yahoo.com> lpaalc...@yahoo.com>
Sender: "CnC-List" < <mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com>
cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:04:01 
To:  <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> cnc-list@cnc-list.com<
<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Reply-To: Leslie Paal < <mailto:lpaalc...@yahoo.com> lpaalc...@yahoo.com>,
<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Stus-List More on GPS accuracy

_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com/
 <mailto:CnC-List@cnc-list.com> CnC-List@cnc-list.com

 


_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com <http://www.cncphotoalbum.com/> 
CnC-List@cnc-list.com



_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to