Sorry I guess I should have been a bit more clear, I just forget the proper terms at the moment :) ESXI would be the host running the various different VM's, or I would be running another os (say scientific Linux) with virtual box on top of it, running the VM's. I'm trying to get a sense of the preferred way of doing things.
-----Original message----- From: Anand Singh <an...@linizen.com> Sent: Tuesday 17th September 2013 14:36 To: CLUG General <clug-talk@clug.ca> Subject: Re: [clug-talk] Virtualized Server Question Hi Andrew, If you're looking for an open source alternative to ESXi, it's not Virtualbox. Even running headless, it's not in the same league for server performance (nor was it designed to be). Look at KVM or Xen instead. I've got about a dozen of those Supermicro servers running at various sites. Despite my ambitions to go open source, they're all running ESXi. Anand. _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list clug-talk@clug.ca http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
_______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list clug-talk@clug.ca http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
