Some distributions are more bleeding-edge than others about kerne releases,
whereas others take a bit more time to work out potential problems.
Sometimes releases do patch security problems, sometimes not.

I like to err on the side of stability, especially in production
environments.

It's not the first time Ubuntu has caused dependency problems in the server
distro,
and it's quite disappointing to hear that it's still an issue. I gave up on
Ubuntu server
3 years ago for this very thing. This is 2013, this problem should not be
happening
for a distro that is marketed for production environments.

This is exactly why RHEL, and Debian are the market server distributions of
choice.
Rock-solid stability depends on thorough testing before release, not
bugfixing after the fact.

 Don't get me wrong, this will NOT turn into an Ubuntu bash-fest, but I do
feel the need
  to point out the vast majority of their development is aimed squarely at
home users, and
  now the mobile market. The server releases seem to come as an
afterthought, which
  creates the situation we see now.
_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
clug-talk@clug.ca
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to