Not like me. I'm simple and like things that work. Torvalds thinks Gnome 3 bites too. (bad pun?)
I think the root problem is the imperative to do new exciting things. Gnome 2 has good functionality but (I understand) the guts are a mess. So why not clean up a proven design? Because it ain't a new 'n bold thing to do? Microsoft has top notch power designers. On 12-05-01 02:52 PM, Lance A. Brown wrote:
On 05/01/12 15:56, Greg Saunders wrote:Here is why Linux on the desktop is a failure: It's designed by developers like you and me. Get a top notch design agency engaged, people that understand "user experience" and UI design, it could be a different story. We, developers, haven't come up with any UI improvements since the mid 80s.Just don't hire whomever did the UI work for Gnome3 or UNITY. Oy! --[Lance]
<<attachment: caziz.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list clug-talk@clug.ca http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
