On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 00:37 -0600, Gustin Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Shawn wrote:
> > Bruce Byfield has an article up that explores the current state of the
> > desktop and poses the question in this messages subject.
> > 
> > http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3826171_1/Does-the-Linux-Desktop-Innovate-Too-Much.htm
> > 
> > 
> > It's an interesting read, and has a wide range of comments as well.
> 
> I could not finish reading all the comments.  This is one of those
> topics I avoid because I just end up angry.  There are lots of loud
> opinions by people who have no effing clue what they are talking about.
> 
> I also know that I don't know what I am talking about in this realm.
> What I do know is that the current paradigm is broken.  If I knew how to
> fix it I would.  I am hopeful that projects like KDE4 and Sugar have the
> courage to innovate based on studying how humans actually work, but for
> right now we will have to suffer under the tyranny of the typewriter and
> the TV.
> 
> > What do you think?  Is the desktop development moving too fast?  What is
> > YOUR vision for a desktop 10 years from now?
> > 
> My vision for 10 years is that there is no desktop.  Seriously, the
> 1970s called, they want their clunky and  inefficient human to computer
> interface back.  If we are very lucky, 10 years from now people will
> wonder just what we were thinking.  The real revolution will begin once
> we figure out how to actually use a computer.
> 
> I suspect that gestures and or touch will dominate and mice will be as
> quaint as a rotary telephone. There will likely always be some sort of
> pen for the artists, various musical interfaces that mimic actual
> instruments (these won't be needed but many like me will take a while to
> leave those particular interfaces behind), but for most the traditional
> UI will likely disappear, replaced by speech and gestures.
> 
I'm not sold on that vision.  There is a difference between data
manipulation, which don't need to be done via command line.  What
doesn't work there is data entry in all it's various forms - so how do
you enter your info into a zone file without your keyboard?

> That last bit was just pure imagination.  I don't really have a clue
> about this stuff.  I would ask the people who are actually working on
> this stuff.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkpAeD8ACgkQwRXgH3rKGfMruACfflr1b49IEggX/6JA+ggnK8o4
> /uMAn01ze0fx2afHdgP8W9Fk/eQ5MSNP
> =BotB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> clug-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying


_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to