On Mar 5, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013, at 01:14 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:11:51AM -0800, Alex Huang wrote: >>> So in this definition, MAJOR and above must be fixed before a release is >>> cut? >> >> Personally, I've used the "no blockers and <5 critical with work >> arounds" as the criteria, using the definitions I offered. > > How many "Major" bugs are acceptable? Currently we have 187. Even if > they're not going to completely disrupt use of the platform, it seems to > me that releasing with >100 major bugs is a bit much.
Bit off-thread, but could we have a bug sprint ? > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
