On Tue, Mar 5, 2013, at 01:14 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:11:51AM -0800, Alex Huang wrote: > > So in this definition, MAJOR and above must be fixed before a release is > > cut? > > Personally, I've used the "no blockers and <5 critical with work > arounds" as the criteria, using the definitions I offered.
How many "Major" bugs are acceptable? Currently we have 187. Even if they're not going to completely disrupt use of the platform, it seems to me that releasing with >100 major bugs is a bit much. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
