On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:28:50PM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: > I would say let's bring in the tool and use it in place of review > board the same way, if not otherwise. Let's have the tool anyway, if > not us I bet there may be other projects who may use it. > > Regards.
I'm with Rohit on this one. I'd like something better than reviewboard, and personally think that we may want to inject a review system between all contributors / committers and the master branch in the future. I'm not suggesting doing it now, but having the option would be very useful as the community grows. -chip > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013, at 04:31 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > >> -1 for reasons listed by others. I think Gerrit's great, and I like the > >> idea of peer code reviews, but my gut feel is this doesn't gel well with > >> an open source project (happy to review examples where it's being used…) > > > > So, I'm not arguing *for* Gerrit here - but there are plenty of examples > > of Gerrit being used by FOSS projects: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/wiki/ShowCases > > > > Best, > > > > jzb > > -- > > Joe Brockmeier > > j...@zonker.net > > Twitter: @jzb > > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ >
