+1 (binding) On 19/01/13 8:43 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" <[email protected]> wrote:
>+1 (binding) > >On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:18:30PM +0530, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >> Reposting with subject line VOTE. >> >> Committers have binding votes for this decision. >> >> Please respond with your vote: >> +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this >> +enhancement to CloudStack >> in via the IP clearance process >> +0 - Don't care >> -1 - Do not accept the donation >> >> This vote will remain open for ~72 hours. >> >> Content Location: http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:05 PM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: RE: [IP Clearance] Potential issues >> > >> > On people.apache.org/~jtomechak, I have posted all my docs related to >>the bug >> > items in the IP Clearance list which Animesh provided. >> > >> > I have made notations in the Doc sub-task of each bug, so that anyone >> > reviewing the proposed feature can easily find the documentation. >> > >> > In addition, I made a note for myself of the doc status of each bug >>in that list, >> > and here it is for anyone who is interested! >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-774 : >> > Code in ACS repo: No >> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > Contribution Size Approx: 5000 lines >> > Contributor : Frank >> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> > Docs: None exist. This was not announced or supported as a Citrix CP >>3.0.6 >> > feature. >> > >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-306 : >> > Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes in October Contribution Size Approx: >>1500 >> > lines Contributor : Sheng IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: >>Yes >> > Docs: Already submitted via reviewboard. Link and info in doc subtask. >> > >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-777/700 : >> > Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > Functional Spec Posted: No >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > Contribution Size Approx: 500 lines >> > Contributor : Kishan/Jayapal/Rajesh/Murali IP Clearance needed initial >> > recommendation: Yes >> > Docs: Pending on reviewboard. URL and notations in the doc subtask of >>the bug. >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-778/319 : >> > Code in ACS repo: No >> > Functional Spec Posted: No >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > Contribution Size Approx: should be small Contributor : Vijayendra IP >>Clearance >> > needed initial recommendation: This is a trivial issue so may be no >> > Docs: Pending on reviewboard. Info is in the doc subtask of the bug. >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-299 : >> > Code in ACS repo: UI code is there but backend is not Functional Spec >>Posted: >> > Yes Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size Approx: 1400 >>lines >> > Contributor : Jayapal IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> > Docs: Pending on reviewboard. Link is provided in the description of >>the bug. >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-297 : >> > Code in ACS repo: No, but posted on review board Functional Spec >>Posted: Yes >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size Approx: 350 lines >> > Contributor : Hari IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: >> > Docs: One paragraph of new docs on people.a.o. The URL is noted in >>the doc >> > subtask of the bug. >>http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-297/ >> > >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-197 : >> > Code in ACS repo: Multiple patches posted on review board Functional >>Spec >> > Posted: Yes Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size Approx: >>3000 >> > lines Contributor : Likitha IP Clearance needed initial >>recommendation: No, >> > since incremental patches were posted over a period >> > Docs: Believe docs already exist, authored on the community side by >>Sebastien >> > G. >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-192 : >> > Code in ACS repo: No >> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes, but no consensus reached Contribution >>Size >> > Approx: 1000 lines Contributor : Sanjay IP Clearance needed initial >> > recommendation: Yes, if community agrees to feature inclusion >> > Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the bug. >> > http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-192/ >> > >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-304 / 784 : >> > Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > Contribution Size Approx: 600 >> > Contributor : Alena >> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, since commits were >>done >> > way back in October over a period of 1 week >> > Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the bug. >> > http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-737/ >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-265 : >> > Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > Contribution Size Approx: 450 >> > Contributor : Murali >> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> > Docs: Pending on reviewboard. URL is noted in the doc subtask of the >>bug. >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-737 : >> > Code in ACS repo: No >> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > Contribution Size Approx: 2000 >> > Contributor : Anthony >> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> > Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the bug. >> > http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-737/ >> > >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-177 : >> > Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > Contribution Size Approx: 300 >> > Contributor : Brian >> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits over >> > several days >> > Docs: None were written, probably none needed >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-662 : >> > Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > Contribution Size Approx: 500 >> > Contributor : Brian >> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits over >> > several days >> > Docs: None were written, probably none needed >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-176 : >> > Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > Contribution Size Approx: 200 >> > Contributor : Pranav >> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits over >> > several days >> > Docs: None needed >> > >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-312 : >> > Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > Contribution Size Approx: >> > Contributor : Murali >> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Potentially yes, multiple >>commits >> > in one day >> > Docs: Pending on reviewboard. The URL is noted in the Doc subtask of >>the bug. >> > >> > >> > CLOUDSTACK-873 : >> > Code in ACS repo: No >> > Functional Spec Posted: No >> > Community Discussion Done: No >> > Contribution Size Approx: Work not started Contributor : Vijayendra/ >>Kelven IP >> > Clearance needed initial recommendation: No as work has not started >>on it yet. >> > Preliminary investigation done, running into issues with vmware. >> > Docs: No existing docs. >> > >> > >> > Jessica Tomechak >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:25 PM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: RE: [IP Clearance] Potential issues >> > >> > I am waiting for code to be posted to start the IP clearance process >>for the ones >> > identified in my email. Let me send reminders. >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]] >> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:19 PM >> > > To: [email protected] >> > > Subject: Re: [IP Clearance] Potential issues >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > To keep the community posted on status on IP clearance. I have >> > > > followed up >> > > with the contributors of the issues mentioned, as soon as the code >>is >> > > posted publicly, we will start the IP clearance review process. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks >> > > > Animesh >> > > >> > > Animesh (others) - are there any challenges that you need help with >>in >> > > getting this done? > >-- >Prasanna.,
