> -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:07 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:57 PM > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > I am struggling to read all the emails on dev list everyday, > >> > it's just so > >> many emails. Is it possible, that enable/allow/encourage us CC to > >> somebody if you think the topic he/she should take a look at? I think > >> it will save both of us a lot of time. > >> > >> Edison, > >> > >> I'm fine with CC'ing someone specific when I know that I need their > >> attention, but two caveats that I'm worried about are: > >> > >> 1 - I find myself often needing the whole community's attention, for > >> VOTE threads or release planning updates, etc... I struggle to > >> understand how folks want to see this. I thought that VOTE and ACS41 > >> would be sufficient headers for people to actually pay attention to, > >> but it appears to not be working. > >> > >> 2 - If someone starts a thread, I would expect that they would > >> actually pay attention to that thread! I've seen times when people > >> start a thread, but don't respond to queries from others in the > >> community. This is especially vexing when the thread is about a work > that's in progress. > > > > Exactly, this is the situation we should use CC, if you think other people > should pay attention to the thread, but seems they didn't, then CC will be > much efficient, than waiting for other people's response or sending private > email to other people(oh, there is email on the list, can you take a look at ) > etc. > > CC somebody doesn't mean they will reply immediately, but at least, we > tried directly, other than waiting forever. > > > > Which of the two concerns are you saying "exactly" to?
Item 2. > > > > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> -chip > >
