On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> You can if you assume that it is of LL-type. Windows requires a registry > fix to generate an 'LL' type DUID. > Does dhcp6c support it? Didn't see a word from the document about DUID type, and it genereate LLT type by default Probably I should try another dhcpv6 client. > > You can also get dnsmasq to ignore the duid and use the mac. > Haven't confirmed it's possible to use the mac, asking dnsmasq mailing list... --Sheng > > On 1/14/13 9:54 AM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > > >On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers < > >htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > > > >> Side note, but where are we going to do development? I think we should > >>get > >> our work in a feature branch as soon as possible so we can all > >>contribute > >> to the development. > >> > >> Sheng, can you push any work you have done to a branch? I'll check and > >>see > >> if I need to commit any of my changes then. > >> > > > >We'd like to have the work based on Chiradeep's network refactor branch, > >but currently we're waiting for Javelin to be merged. > > > >And I am dong some PoC right now, so no code is written so far. I just > >found it's not that straightforward to get the dnsmasq work as we thought. > > > >We need DUID from client(not MAC) to hand out ipv6 addresses, but I am not > >sure if that's something we can know from mgmt server side. > > > >--Sheng > > > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Hugo > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] > >> Sent: vrijdag 11 januari 2013 19:50 > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support > >> > >> > >> On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 PM, John Kinsella <j...@stratosec.co> > >>wrote: > >> >> From a quick glance at it's man page, looks like it can do v4 and v6 > >> >> leases at the same time... > >> > You mean dhcpd? > >> > > >> > >> No, dnsmasq looked like it could... > >> > >> > I am exploring all the possibility right now. > >> > > >> > Currently dnsmasq in our systemvm doesn't support DHCPv6, so we would > >> > either update to a newer version dnsmasq, or using other dhcp > >>server(e.g. > >> > dhcpd) on DHCPv6. > >> > > >> > But replacing the dhcp server is a big work, all the configuration > >> > need to be rewritten. Regarding dhcpd, I haven't figured out how much > >> > effort we need to spend if we want to switch. > >> > > >> > There is one possible solution for this release: say, using dhcpd only > >> > for IPv6, to reduce our effort of introducing IPv6(if it's easier than > >> > moving to dhcpd). And then we can make the choice in the later > >>release. > >> > > >> > John, do you have some experiences can share regarding dhcpd? > >> > > >> > Also, regarding your problem, have you used cloudstack to distribute > >> > IP? I don't think we support leasing on two /28s in advance network > >>now? > >> > >> So, in my lab env I've made a few changes to the server and UI to allow > >> multiple IP blocks in basic network (haven't tried in advanced yet), > >>then > >> additionally I'm passing a netmask down to the agent, then that's passed > >> through to dhcp_entry.sh, and then into edithosts.sh, which I've > >>updated to > >> support dhcpd. The one thing I wanted to do but haven't is to update > >> edithosts.sh to support both dnsmasq as well as dhcpd. > >> > >> Note: this was done in-house without community involvement as I didn't > >> expect general interest in this, but I'm happy to use experience gained > >>to > >> write similar support in the ASF tree. > >> > >> Johh > >> > >
