You can if you assume that it is of LL-type. Windows requires a registry fix to generate an 'LL' type DUID.
You can also get dnsmasq to ignore the duid and use the mac. On 1/14/13 9:54 AM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers < >htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > >> Side note, but where are we going to do development? I think we should >>get >> our work in a feature branch as soon as possible so we can all >>contribute >> to the development. >> >> Sheng, can you push any work you have done to a branch? I'll check and >>see >> if I need to commit any of my changes then. >> > >We'd like to have the work based on Chiradeep's network refactor branch, >but currently we're waiting for Javelin to be merged. > >And I am dong some PoC right now, so no code is written so far. I just >found it's not that straightforward to get the dnsmasq work as we thought. > >We need DUID from client(not MAC) to hand out ipv6 addresses, but I am not >sure if that's something we can know from mgmt server side. > >--Sheng > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Hugo >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] >> Sent: vrijdag 11 januari 2013 19:50 >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support >> >> >> On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 PM, John Kinsella <j...@stratosec.co> >>wrote: >> >> From a quick glance at it's man page, looks like it can do v4 and v6 >> >> leases at the same time... >> > You mean dhcpd? >> > >> >> No, dnsmasq looked like it could... >> >> > I am exploring all the possibility right now. >> > >> > Currently dnsmasq in our systemvm doesn't support DHCPv6, so we would >> > either update to a newer version dnsmasq, or using other dhcp >>server(e.g. >> > dhcpd) on DHCPv6. >> > >> > But replacing the dhcp server is a big work, all the configuration >> > need to be rewritten. Regarding dhcpd, I haven't figured out how much >> > effort we need to spend if we want to switch. >> > >> > There is one possible solution for this release: say, using dhcpd only >> > for IPv6, to reduce our effort of introducing IPv6(if it's easier than >> > moving to dhcpd). And then we can make the choice in the later >>release. >> > >> > John, do you have some experiences can share regarding dhcpd? >> > >> > Also, regarding your problem, have you used cloudstack to distribute >> > IP? I don't think we support leasing on two /28s in advance network >>now? >> >> So, in my lab env I've made a few changes to the server and UI to allow >> multiple IP blocks in basic network (haven't tried in advanced yet), >>then >> additionally I'm passing a netmask down to the agent, then that's passed >> through to dhcp_entry.sh, and then into edithosts.sh, which I've >>updated to >> support dhcpd. The one thing I wanted to do but haven't is to update >> edithosts.sh to support both dnsmasq as well as dhcpd. >> >> Note: this was done in-house without community involvement as I didn't >> expect general interest in this, but I'm happy to use experience gained >>to >> write similar support in the ASF tree. >> >> Johh >>
