I was out for a few weeks. I will update the wiki today to reflect the discussion in the community. To clarify one point from an earlier post by Sebastien, the marketplace code I am referring to is the client piece.
Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 10:53 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Pranav Saxena > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Opennebula marketplace integration > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Dec 27, 2012, at 3:32 PM, Pranav Saxena <pranav.sax...@citrix.com> > wrote: > > > >> [Sebastien] - Was the page updated to take into account all the > discussions that happened on the ML ? > >> > >> Also what is in this feature branch ? I believe it was created before we > >> had > all the discussions. Does it contain the core marketplace code and the repo > listings components ? It should only contain the "client"/plugin side. > >> > >> [Pranav] - Yes , Sebastien . So currently we just have a very basic client > /plugin side code which creates a tab for marketplace tab on the cloudstack > UI . Clicking on that would point to a new user interface which fetches the > content and images/thumbnails dynamically from dummy config files . You > can imagine it as a tile-like structure displaying N number of applications > uploaded by each user. It does NOT contain any core marketplace code. > >> > > > > I created a sub-task of CLOUDSTACK-619: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-619 for the opennebula > integration. > > > > Right now, I don't believe the wiki page has been updated to reflect all the > discussion on the ML, see: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Mar > k > > etplace+Proposal > > > > My plan is to use the opennebula marketplace api to populate the "dummy > config files". The marketplace server and api keys should probably be > configured as global settings. > > > > Who is doing a separate marketplace repo using your own code (not the UI > client code ) ? > > > > -Sebastien > > > > > > > > > Sonny, you are currently the assignee in CLOUDSTACK-619. Do you think we > can get the functional spec updated to reflect the list discussions on this > topic? > > The spec, as it currently stands, still reflects some of the concepts that I > have > a standing veto on. I'd be very happy if we work around the issues that I > (and others) have raised in the design and implementation.
