On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Chip Childers > <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Chiradeep Vittal >> <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/19/12 12:44 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal >>>>> <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>>> Since it is a vast topic, I added subtasks in the Jira bug to make it >>>>>>more >>>>>> manageable. >>>>>> >>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-452?subTaskView=all#iss >>>>>>uet >>>>>> able >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is indeed a massive feature - are you sure that this is >>>>> achievable in the 4.1 timeframe??? >>>>> >>>>> --David >>>>> >>>> >>>>I don't see fix versions of the Jira records set to 4.1.0. I'm going >>>>to set them to the "Future" release as fix version, and if the folks >>>>developing the feature are able to pull some component into 4.1.0, we >>>>can discuss that specifically. >>> >>> I see that the subtasks have been moved into separate bugs. For the >>> record, these are >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-673 to CLOUDSTACK-679 >>> >>> >> >> They are all still sub tasks of the parent though... I just changed >> the fix versions of the parent and child tasks. > > I think for 4.1, we can get non-isolated network works. Because it > only involved DNS and DHCP, should be a nice first step. > > For LB and firewall, that's much more complex, we can do it later. > > --Sheng
One question regarding security group in advance network. Anyone has an estimate on how much effort it would take to support ipv6 with it? If we would have dual stack. --Sheng
