I forgot to add... I second the notion that Basic Networking should be supported. I think this feature targets basic more so anyways. With basics single network, direct public IPs, managing aliases would allow far more flexibility to the platform. Especially any one trying to host an SSL endpoint on a basic network.
Sent from my iPhone On Dec 15, 2012, at 11:52 AM, "Kelceydamage@bbits" <kel...@bbits.ca> wrote: > This is a prime example where guest scripts make sense for automating the > interface alias creation. I still think I'm missing something however, does > this include a new fetch IP API? > > Also the 30 IP limit seems out of place, when I can go in right now and give > any guest VM 256+ interface aliases without restriction. The default isolated > network behind any VR is also a /24. Maybe adjust the limit to 256. That way > it's more of a logical boundary. > > Thanks > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 15, 2012, at 8:38 AM, John Kinsella <j...@stratosec.co> wrote: > >> I'd remove the limitation of having 30 IPs per interface. Modern OSes can >> support way more. >> >> Why no support for basic networking? I can see a small hosting provider with >> a basic setup wanting to manage web servers... >> >> John >> >> On Dec 14, 2012, at 9:37 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi >> <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Current guest VM by default having one NIC and one IP address assigned. >>> If your wants extra IP for the guest VM, there no provision from the CS. >>> >>> Using multiple IP address per NIC feature CS can associate IP address for >>> the NIC, user can take that IP and assign it to the VM. >>> >>> Please find the FS for the more details. >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Multiple+IP+address+per+NIC >>> >>> Please provide your comments on the FS. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> jayapal >> >> Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service >> o: 415.315.9385 >> @johnlkinsella >>
