Interesting, I spoke with Brocade yesterday and the also feel their Vyatta acquisition is a good gap offering for cloud services.
Maybe we should see if their willing to produce the code? Sent from my iPhone On Dec 6, 2012, at 9:07 AM, Clayton Weise <cwe...@iswest.net> wrote: > I would love to see a Vyatta based router as well, and they have a RESTful > API (which is both good and bad given the mixture of tools. But making use > of a REST interface on a virtual router opens up the ability to integrate > with other vendors who have virtual router/firewall appliances. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] > Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 8:43 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: CentOS System VM? > > Vyatta provides great L3-L4 support with good number of features and > interface. > > If there is a doc on how to create and integrate your system offering - that > would be great. Unfortunately vyatta is also debian based.. but that's not > exactly a hard negative. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 11:25 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: CentOS System VM? > > I guess we can try creating alternative system offering :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca] > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 3:17 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: CentOS System VM? > > I'm also interested in swapping out ha_proxy for nginx so the lb feature can > support SSL termination. Currently building my own VRs as guest VMs on shared > networks for that feature. > > Is the community thinking about proper ssl endpoints and offloading? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 5, 2012, at 11:30 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" <imusa...@webmd.net> wrote: > >> Granted both debian wheezy and centos/rhel 6, run the same major kernel >> version 2.6.32 i386 and hopefully same glibc library (need to confirm) - it >> should be really easy to port the code over without needing to recompile >> anything. I don't believe we do anything overly complex - within application >> code - that would glue components to specific OS. Applications like apache, >> dns masq, haproxy, sshd and dhcp can be stock versions of what OS vendor >> released. >> >> This is my observations so far and I will give it a shot when time allows to >> confirm. >> >> If someone knows of reason why this would fail, please let me know so I >> don't waste my time:) but I am fairly optimistic. >> >> Thanks >> Ilya >> >> "Kelceydamage@bbits" <kel...@bbits.ca> wrote: >> This sounds great, however I am hoping for updated wiki on how to create >> your own system vm(distro). >> >> Maybe one day.... >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Dec 5, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> >> wrote: >> >>> The current system vm is getting long in the tooth. I (or Rohit >>> Yadav) will looking into building a wheezy-based systemvm that >>> includes hyper-v drivers. >>> Hopefully network throughput should be better as well when used with >>> multiple cores. >>> >>> On 12/5/12 10:38 AM, "Jason Davis" <scr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> TBH Hyper-V synthetic drivers(modules) is supported in the mainline >>>> kernel. >>>> >>>> So the argument that CentOS 6.x has better support is moot. >>>> >>>> This assumes that the kernel version on the SSVM is at least 2.6.32. >>>> I ran Ubuntu Server 11.x and Centos 6.x on Hyper-V natively and just >>>> needed to load the kernel modules for the synthetic stuffs to work. >>>> >>>> Ancient example of getting the Hyper-V modules built/working on >>>> Debian 6.0 >>>> http://virtualisationandmanagement.wordpress.com/2010/11/02/debian-o >>>> n-hype r-v-with-4-vcpu-support-and-syntetic-network/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits >>>> <kel...@bbits.ca> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm very interested in this. >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 5, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Donal Lafferty >>>>> <donal.laffe...@citrix.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Has anyone looked into building a system VM that runs on a CentOS >>>>> distro? >>>>> >>> >> > > > >
