The sooner we decouple the systemVMs and allow preference in OS, and user building, we will be better off.
Sent from my iPhone On Dec 5, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Jason Davis <scr...@gmail.com> wrote: > TBH Hyper-V synthetic drivers(modules) is supported in the mainline kernel. > > So the argument that CentOS 6.x has better support is moot. > > This assumes that the kernel version on the SSVM is at least 2.6.32. I ran > Ubuntu Server 11.x and Centos 6.x on Hyper-V natively and just needed to > load the kernel modules for the synthetic stuffs to work. > > Ancient example of getting the Hyper-V modules built/working on Debian 6.0 > http://virtualisationandmanagement.wordpress.com/2010/11/02/debian-on-hyper-v-with-4-vcpu-support-and-syntetic-network/ > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits <kel...@bbits.ca> wrote: > >> I'm very interested in this. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Dec 5, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Donal Lafferty <donal.laffe...@citrix.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Has anyone looked into building a system VM that runs on a CentOS distro? >>
