On 10/17/12 4:54 PM, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Chiradeep Vittal ><chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >> +1 on fixing in a 4.0.x. >> We need to make some tough decisions if we want "time based releases". >> We already dropped AutoScale and Brocade even though they were >>essentially >> code-complete for this reason. >> This is an issue that is of uncertain size (weeks at least) to fix. >>There >> is just too much uncertainty. >> Also it seems that folks want the latest version of OVM anyway, which >> would not be helped by fixing this in 4.0 > > >So I don't really know if I know enough to cast a vote either way. If >this is something simple that can be fixed in a couple of days >(including the licensing issues) - I'm for letting it remain a >blocker. If it's 8 man-weeks of effort, well that's a different story. > >--David According to Frank, "it takes a while". My interpretation was >1 week. :) -- Chiradeep
