Alright, let's do that after 4.0 release? ________________________________________ From: Edison Su [edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 2:01 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: CloudStack DeveloperList Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Pull some 4.0 specific commits on master?
I would suggest to get rid of ant on master, so people can work with maven, and fix maven. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 8, 2012, at 10:20 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > +1 on maintaining ant for another couple of weeks. > > On 10/8/12 7:13 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Hey folks, >> >> Since the ant build system is broken on master, we committed few build >> related patches to 4.0 instead of master. Should we pull them on master? >> >> As we move on with deprecating ant on master, does that even make sense >> to pull such build related commits on master from 4.0? >> Or, should we use 4.0 as a maintenance branch where we cherry pick only >> useful bug fixes and other commits from master and vice-versa, while do >> build etc. 4.0 related stuff on 4.0. >> >> These are the seven out of sync commits I know of: >> >> commit 4448042037a35dca62950aaf36426b802a00afdd >> commit a286f68723b9503fe719ad3063f66379750cb48f >> commit 21bea9c8e220489a90a40bb365fe5fd3e1d519ed (revert) >> commit e241925057c44fafde3d5b755be72d494b35c68b >> commit 3b78d6980af4720bd71784471c1b1b8b3dd2f34d >> commit 98eef5c9490c349d621180823807561c0ee8b357 >> commit 8ec7cf2b423f751e62db887ffb76cc8be0843719 >> >> Regards. >