+1 on maintaining ant for another couple of weeks. On 10/8/12 7:13 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@citrix.com> wrote:
>Hey folks, > >Since the ant build system is broken on master, we committed few build >related patches to 4.0 instead of master. Should we pull them on master? > >As we move on with deprecating ant on master, does that even make sense >to pull such build related commits on master from 4.0? >Or, should we use 4.0 as a maintenance branch where we cherry pick only >useful bug fixes and other commits from master and vice-versa, while do >build etc. 4.0 related stuff on 4.0. > >These are the seven out of sync commits I know of: > >commit 4448042037a35dca62950aaf36426b802a00afdd >commit a286f68723b9503fe719ad3063f66379750cb48f >commit 21bea9c8e220489a90a40bb365fe5fd3e1d519ed (revert) >commit e241925057c44fafde3d5b755be72d494b35c68b >commit 3b78d6980af4720bd71784471c1b1b8b3dd2f34d >commit 98eef5c9490c349d621180823807561c0ee8b357 >commit 8ec7cf2b423f751e62db887ffb76cc8be0843719 > >Regards.
