On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > > I also removed references to these files from pom.xml so that RAT checks > them. > But perhaps I should not have for those that we retain since we are not > likely to license headers on them >
As I have covered on another thread, there will be types of file, following this work: 1) A file that we wrote 2) A file that someone else wrote For 1) if we can get away with using that all permissive license I brought up elsewhere, I think we should. That, or no explicit license at all for very simple files. (Meaning they would default to Apache.) And that means that we will have to exempt these from RAT. For 2) we cannot add our own headers. A note should go in NOTICE (as I have brought up elsewhere) and we will have to exempt these from RAT. Thanks, -- NS
