This is cool, nice to see this data on the wiki. Thanks! Is this
list exhaustive?


On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:16 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Chip Childers
> > <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:28 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Chip Childers
> >>> <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:55 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Chip Childers
> >>>>> <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:41 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Saying that configuration files, in all cases, are not
> copywritable because
> >>>>>>>> that are, on the whole, not as complex as code is like saying
> that blog
> >>>>>>>> posts, in all cases, are not copywritable because they are, on
> the whole,
> >>>>>>>> not as complex as books.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The law is much more nuanced than that. There is no way we can
> say, up
> >>>>>>>> front, whether a configuration file is protected by copywrite or
> not. The
> >>>>>>>> unwillingness to commit to anything on legal-discuss is an
> indication of
> >>>>>>>> this. (It was made explicit that with a vague question, there
> will only be
> >>>>>>>> vague answers.)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It might be better to actually document what we have, and then
> present that
> >>>>>>>> to legal discuss and take it from there.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Let's get concrete.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We should put together a list of each config file path, along with
> >>>>>>>> information such as:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> * Size of file
> >>>>>>>> * Complexity (key/value, code snippets, what?)
> >>>>>>>> * Copyright notice or license header?
> >>>>>>>> * License of project it (may) have been taken from
> >>>>>>>> * Origin (Citrix, upstream project, unknown?)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Once we have a complete picture, I think we can talk about how to
> proceed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> (And hopefully propose a guideline for future config files.)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I certainly do not think we are in a position to write of an
> entire
> >>>>>>>> category of data as being uncopywritable.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I am happy to run this to pursue this with legal too, but I think
> we need a
> >>>>>>>> better view of what we're dealing with.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Alright, I'll start working on compiling this.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --David
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> David,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do you want to divide and conquer on this task?  I'd be happy to
> help.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -chip
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Happy to have the help
> >>>>> --David
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> David,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've gotten as far as I can with the list (via the google spreadsheet
> >>>> you shared).  I think the next step is to send it out for broader
> >>>> review.  We are going to need the help of the folks that might have
> >>>> originally added the config file / script to the project.
> >>>>
> >>>> -chip
> >>>
> >>> Sorry I haven't been of much help of late.
> >>> Shall we move it to the wiki?
> >>>
> >>> --David
> >>>
> >>
> >> That makes sense.  If you get to it before me, fantastic...  but
> >> otherwise I'll move it over tomorrow.
> >>
> >> -chip
> >
> >
> >
> > It's here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/config-file-listing.html
> >
> > --David
> >
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been out sick the last several days, so I didn't get to this
> sooner.  I'll start up threads over the next couple of hours on each
> of the areas where we need advice / help from others on the list.
>
> -chip
>



-- 
NS

Reply via email to