This is cool, nice to see this data on the wiki. Thanks! Is this list exhaustive?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:16 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Chip Childers > > <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:28 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Chip Childers > >>> <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > >>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:55 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Chip Childers > >>>>> <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:41 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> > wrote: > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> > wrote: > >>>>>>>> Saying that configuration files, in all cases, are not > copywritable because > >>>>>>>> that are, on the whole, not as complex as code is like saying > that blog > >>>>>>>> posts, in all cases, are not copywritable because they are, on > the whole, > >>>>>>>> not as complex as books. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The law is much more nuanced than that. There is no way we can > say, up > >>>>>>>> front, whether a configuration file is protected by copywrite or > not. The > >>>>>>>> unwillingness to commit to anything on legal-discuss is an > indication of > >>>>>>>> this. (It was made explicit that with a vague question, there > will only be > >>>>>>>> vague answers.) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It might be better to actually document what we have, and then > present that > >>>>>>>> to legal discuss and take it from there. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Let's get concrete. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> We should put together a list of each config file path, along with > >>>>>>>> information such as: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> * Size of file > >>>>>>>> * Complexity (key/value, code snippets, what?) > >>>>>>>> * Copyright notice or license header? > >>>>>>>> * License of project it (may) have been taken from > >>>>>>>> * Origin (Citrix, upstream project, unknown?) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Once we have a complete picture, I think we can talk about how to > proceed. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> (And hopefully propose a guideline for future config files.) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I certainly do not think we are in a position to write of an > entire > >>>>>>>> category of data as being uncopywritable. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I am happy to run this to pursue this with legal too, but I think > we need a > >>>>>>>> better view of what we're dealing with. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Alright, I'll start working on compiling this. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> --David > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> David, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do you want to divide and conquer on this task? I'd be happy to > help. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -chip > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Happy to have the help > >>>>> --David > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> David, > >>>> > >>>> I've gotten as far as I can with the list (via the google spreadsheet > >>>> you shared). I think the next step is to send it out for broader > >>>> review. We are going to need the help of the folks that might have > >>>> originally added the config file / script to the project. > >>>> > >>>> -chip > >>> > >>> Sorry I haven't been of much help of late. > >>> Shall we move it to the wiki? > >>> > >>> --David > >>> > >> > >> That makes sense. If you get to it before me, fantastic... but > >> otherwise I'll move it over tomorrow. > >> > >> -chip > > > > > > > > It's here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/config-file-listing.html > > > > --David > > > > Hi all, > > I've been out sick the last several days, so I didn't get to this > sooner. I'll start up threads over the next couple of hours on each > of the areas where we need advice / help from others on the list. > > -chip > -- NS