On 08/10/2012 12:59 AM, David Nalley wrote:
Hi folks,

First, I apologize for bringing up another non-release related
discussion topic.

There have been a couple of times where the issue of the existing
cloudstack.org email addresses have come up - and it's now on our todo
list[1]

== The current situation ==

cloudstack.org currently provides email services via Google Apps for
Domains. There are (guesstimate) less than 10 email addresses for
cloudstack.org, most of them distribution aliases and the balance held
by Citrix employees assigned to work on CloudStack full time.

== The issue ==

At some point in time, after we've migrated enough of our
infrastructure to the ASF, the cloudstack.org domain will also be
transferred. There seems to be a precedent of email aliases/addresses
going away [2], such as what happened with openoffice.org addresses.
As Shane points out in the below thread, there is an issue with
non-committers holding 'resources' of an ASF project, etc. The other
issue is that there are currently a number of 'group addresses' that
exist and will need to be handled, and some proposed addresses (like
security@cs.o) Finally, it seems that the ASF doesn't provide email
service itself, but provides aliases.

== Decision point ==

As a project we need to decide what to do with CloudStack email
service. Regardless of our decision, I want the timeline to be long
enough to have minimal impact on people currently using those
resources. I see a few options - there might be more, feel free to
chime in with some.

The options I see are:

1. Discontinue all cloudstack.org email service.
2. Provide only official - project specific emails aliases (think
webmaster@, security@, etc.)
3. Provide both official project emails as well as committer email aliases.
4. Ask infra to let the project manage email service with Google Apps
for domains, or some similar service.

Obviously we are also bound by what infra guides us to, so one or more
of these options might not really be an option, but I figured we'd try
and get some consensus around this.

Thoughts, comments, flames, other options?


I personally don't need an @cloudstack.org e-mail alias/address, but that's me.

I can think of a legitimate reason for having webmaster@ and security@, but where do we forward them? What do we do with them if the people who it gets forwarded to are on vacation?

We should make an easy entrance for reporting security issues, but having e-mail addresses online tends to attract e-mail from people who seek support, that's what the -users list if for.

Wido

--David

[1]http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html
[2] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201108.mbox/%3c4e452271.8050...@shanecurcuru.org%3E


Reply via email to