Well, if this is your decision to make alone, then I guess we'll have to either convince you or deal with your decision.
-A On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Ewan Mellor <ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com>wrote: > The problem is that "not well tested" is likely to be code for "doesn't > work and has never worked". If someone can convince me that it will be > working in the next 2 weeks (1 week of open development, 1 week stability > and bugfixing) then I'm happy to take that step and remove the SOAP API and > declare 4.0 to be Query API only. If it can't be done in the next two > weeks then we're talking about slipping the release, and no-one wants that. > > Ewan. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: 02 August 2012 08:37 > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: Prachi Damle > > Subject: Re: ec2 API compatibility (WSDL vs Query) > > > > From Chiradeep's note: > > > > > Currently the EC2 API layer implements both the WSDL interface as well > > > as the Query API. > > > However the Query API is not well tested. > > > > So removing the SOAP interface would leave us with the query API... > > which would then need testing. > > > > Am I misunderstanding? > > > > -chip > > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ewan Mellor <ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com> > > wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > >> Sent: 02 August 2012 07:58 > > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re: ec2 API compatibility (WSDL vs Query) > > >> > > >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Adrian Cole > > >> <adrian.f.c...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > Just curious. > > >> > > > >> > If this is the first apache release, and cloudbridge was formerly > > >> > in a different repo, why don't we just rip out the SOAP interface? > > >> > That's a heck of a lot simpler than deprecating the first version of > > something. > > >> > > > >> > -A > > >> > > >> I think we are saying the same thing. In this case, deprecate = rip > it out. > > > > > > Are we saying that? We've got 6 working days of general development > > time before we start locking down for a release. Can we get the query > API > > implemented in that time? > > > > > > Regarding the specific licensing issue, Prachi is looking at what > happens > > when we remove the WSDLs. The server stubs are already in the code base, > > so in theory we shouldn't need the WSDLs to be present anyway. Prachi is > > looking at whether that's true. > > > > > > > > Ewan. > > > > > > >
