>From Chiradeep's note: > Currently the EC2 API layer implements both the WSDL interface as well as > the Query API. > However the Query API is not well tested.
So removing the SOAP interface would leave us with the query API... which would then need testing. Am I misunderstanding? -chip On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ewan Mellor <ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: 02 August 2012 07:58 >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: ec2 API compatibility (WSDL vs Query) >> >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.c...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Just curious. >> > >> > If this is the first apache release, and cloudbridge was formerly in a >> > different repo, why don't we just rip out the SOAP interface? That's >> > a heck of a lot simpler than deprecating the first version of something. >> > >> > -A >> >> I think we are saying the same thing. In this case, deprecate = rip it out. > > Are we saying that? We've got 6 working days of general development time > before we start locking down for a release. Can we get the query API > implemented in that time? > > Regarding the specific licensing issue, Prachi is looking at what happens > when we remove the WSDLs. The server stubs are already in the code base, so > in theory we shouldn't need the WSDLs to be present anyway. Prachi is > looking at whether that's true. > > Ewan. > >
