Hey David, Thanks! However i don't see the change on the master branch at GitHub, am i looking at the right place?
Cheers, Hugo ________________________________________ From: David Nalley [da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 5:58 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Which branch to Nicira integration? On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:52 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Hugo Trippaers > <htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: >> Heya all, >> >> This afternoon we had a nice chat with Chiradeep about the Nicira >> integration. It's moving along nicely know. >> >> However while setting up a test environment with a branch containing new >> code, i ran into trouble with the secondary storage vm. Troubleshooting that >> i found that the master brach (which i used to base my changes on) is >> lacking all build steps for the console-proxy. >> >> So my questions are >> which branch should i base my changes and eventual patch on? 3.0.x, master >> or another one? >> If master, why is the console-proxy taken out and how to work around this? >> > > > You should definitely be building off of a branch based on master in > the git repo - what errors are you seeing with the console proxy? We > likely need to fix that. > > --David That's my fault. I ripped console proxy out of the build-cloud.xml when I was removing it from the RPM (no idea what possessed me to do that), and if you didn't need to build systemVMs you wouldn't have noticed it missing. I just pushed that back in - but it's no longer part of build-all - but you should be able to build it (and the rest of CloudStack) with: ant build-console-proxy build-all Let me know if you run into problems. --David
