2017-01-01 17:16 GMT+01:00 Matching Socks <phill.w...@gmail.com>: > I would expect keywordized namespaces and URIs to agree about equality. > But alpha2's keywordization makes significant the case of %xx hex notation, > which in URIs is not significant. > > user> (let [u1 "http://org.draintheaquifers/%4f"; > u2 "http://org.draintheaquifers/%4F";] > [(.equals (java.net.URI. u1) > (java.net.URI. u2)) > (= (clojure.data.xml.jvm.name/encode-uri u1) > (clojure.data.xml.jvm.name/encode-uri u2))]) > > yields > > [true false] >
Conformance to java.net.URI is a non-goal, as that only implements a subset of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-6 and also, we target not only the JVM. Some examples, where java.net.URI produces false negatives: s://a/%4F = s://a/O s://a/./b = s://a/b http://a:80/b = http://a/b Our current strategy is already acceptable as per ยง6.2.1 of RFC3986 Some amount of normalization might still be desirable and you're welcome to create a ticket for that. However for it to be actionable, we need a clear scope as well as an idea about the performance impact it entails. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
