On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Timothy Baldridge <tbaldri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can see that, and even spec has this use case. In Spec it's solved by > having both A and B in one namespace and using declare to forward-declare > the constructors (or defns in this case). > > So I guess the way I see it the tradeoff is a declare and > all-in-one-namespace vs a massive complexity addition to the compiler and > the redefinition of compilation units. The declare method seems like the > cleaner route. > > I wonder whether there could be something like an `external-declare` that would satisfy Rich's concerns about knowing how to intern unencountered vars, while allowing cyclical references when needed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
