On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Timothy Baldridge <tbaldri...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> So the layout looks like this:
>
> Interfaces.clj
>              |
> ------------------------------------------------
> |                              |
> ImplementationA   Implementation B
> |                              |
> ------------------------------------------------
>          |
> Orchestration (Setup) Namespace
>
>
>

The problem I've had with this is that Implementations A and B are
generally going to be records.  For best performance, you want to write the
implementation of a record's protocols directly inside of the record.  If
the implementation of A requires constructing a B, and implementing a B
requires constructing an A, you've got a problem because a record's
constructors aren't part of Interfaces.clj, but are part of the namespaces
in which the records are defined.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to