On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Timothy Baldridge <tbaldri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So the layout looks like this: > > Interfaces.clj > | > ------------------------------------------------ > | | > ImplementationA Implementation B > | | > ------------------------------------------------ > | > Orchestration (Setup) Namespace > > > The problem I've had with this is that Implementations A and B are generally going to be records. For best performance, you want to write the implementation of a record's protocols directly inside of the record. If the implementation of A requires constructing a B, and implementing a B requires constructing an A, you've got a problem because a record's constructors aren't part of Interfaces.clj, but are part of the namespaces in which the records are defined. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.