Mauricio, thanks for the response! I agree that that gets what I asked for done, but that solution is in essence writing the same qualified/unqualified version of the spec twice and sounded redundant, which lead to my question. I guess it is what it is in that case...
Leon, thanks for the response. what I meant to say by 'exclusive' is the 'same'(difference in namespaced or not) keyword that get checked by req/req-un options. i.e. req only checks for the qualified version and req-un only checks for the unqualified version. Sorry, should have been clearer. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
