On 8/23/16, 7:45 AM, "Alex Miller" <clojure@googlegroups.com on behalf of a...@puredanger.com> wrote: > I'm absolutely not talking about making something hard on purpose > and I'm not saying that making things easy to learn is bad. I'm > stating an ordering of priorities.
…and this is why I think it’s more important that Clojure is as “simple” and consistent as possible, so that when you are a beginner with Clojure, there are fewer surprises and the rules you need to learn are more straightforward. Despite clojure.spec messages not being “easy” to read at first – because they are unfamiliar – they are “simple” insofar as they are clearly structured and consistent and can be traced thru using just the ‘doc’ function. Sean -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
