On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 6:45:16 PM UTC-5, Oliver George wrote: > > > I'm interested to see any discussion regarding this point. No doubt > translating spec data into more friendly formats has been discussed. > > Getting the data right is clojure's problem. That's the concrete > foundation and building blocks required for tooling. Seems like Rich has > done spectacularly there. > > Potentially it's up to tooling to do more with that data. I'd love to > hear Bruce (figwheel), Collin's (cursive) and Bozhidar (cider) opinions > about that. >
Bruce has done some stuff with custom explain error reporting around cljs config (I think?) that was interesting. And I know of others that have built things too. I think those are cool and there are likely to be good places where they're useful, particularly in graphical editor environments where there are opportunities to do special stuff. But the intention is that the default messages should be useful without plugging something else in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
