On Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 9:41:59 PM UTC-5, Mars0i wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 4:32:40 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: >> >> You can file a jira if you like, I'm not sure Rich's thoughts on this. >> > > I understand. Thanks--will do. > > >> Also, keep in mind that you can also compose preds and get this with >> slightly more effort now: >> >> (s/and (s/double-in :min 0.0 :max 1.0) #(not= 0.0 %)) >> > > Yes, definitely. Though #(and (> % 0.0) (<= % 1)) seems simpler if one > doesn't really need the NaN and Infinity tests. >
You'll find that the generator for double-in is far better than what you're suggesting, and you should lean on it when doing things slightly differently. I didn't try it but I don't think your example would gen at all - you'd need to s/and double? in there too at the beginning and even then it's going to generate random doubles then filter to your range, but most generated values will not be in the range. s/double-in is designed to only generate values in the specified range. > > Thanks. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
